Is Race Irrelevant?.
by SIRS Publishing, Inc.
Material type: BookSeries: SIRS Enduring Issues 2003Article 31Human Relations. Publisher: California Journal, 2002ISSN: 1522-3248;.Subject(s): Connerly, Ward | Ethnic groups | Ethnicity | Race -- Classification | Race discrimination | Racial Privacy Initiative | Racially mixed people | CaliforniaDDC classification: 050 Summary: "The Racial Privacy Initiative...would eliminate the boxes on myriad government forms, applications and paperwork that currently identify the author's race. It is a debate that is likely to be inflammatory." (CALIFORNIA JOURNAL) This article is an interview with Ward Connerly, the sponsor of California's controversial Racial Privacy Initiative, in which he argues "race today is 'irrelevant.' It is not a factor that should be considered in government decisions, and it is no longer valid in a society that has a large and growing multi-racial population.".Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due |
---|---|---|---|---|
Books | High School - old - to delete | REF SIRS 2003 Hum31 (Browse shelf) | Available |
Articles Contained in SIRS Enduring Issues 2003.
Originally Published: Is Race Irrelevant?, June 2002; pp. 36-39.
"The Racial Privacy Initiative...would eliminate the boxes on myriad government forms, applications and paperwork that currently identify the author's race. It is a debate that is likely to be inflammatory." (CALIFORNIA JOURNAL) This article is an interview with Ward Connerly, the sponsor of California's controversial Racial Privacy Initiative, in which he argues "race today is 'irrelevant.' It is not a factor that should be considered in government decisions, and it is no longer valid in a society that has a large and growing multi-racial population.".
Records created from non-MARC resource.
There are no comments for this item.