Library Logo
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Capping Malpractice Damage Awards Is the Cruelest Idea in Decades. Michael J. Saks.

by Saks, Michael J; ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
Series: SIRS Enduring Issues 2004Article 9Health. Publisher: KRT News Service, 2003ISSN: 1522-323X;.Subject(s): Actions and defenses | Damages | Health care reform | Insurance -- Health -- Law and legislation | Insurance -- Malpractice | Medical care -- Cost of | Physicians -- MalpracticeDDC classification: 050 Summary: "The idea of capping the non-economic damage awards that medical malpractice defendants owe their victims is currently the most popular reform suggested for the civil justice system. It also is the cruelest and most illogical idea to come along in decades." (KRT NEWS SERVICE) This article explains why capping non-economic awards in malpractice cases is unfeasible.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Add tag(s)
Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due
Books Books High School - old - to delete
REF SIRS 2004 Health Article 9 (Browse shelf) Available

Articles Contained in SIRS Enduring Issues 2004.

Originally Published: Capping Malpractice Damage Awards Is the Cruelest Idea in Decades, Aug. 14, 2003; pp. n.p..

"The idea of capping the non-economic damage awards that medical malpractice defendants owe their victims is currently the most popular reform suggested for the civil justice system. It also is the cruelest and most illogical idea to come along in decades." (KRT NEWS SERVICE) This article explains why capping non-economic awards in malpractice cases is unfeasible.

Records created from non-MARC resource.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha