Courts Are Split on Internet Bans. Matt Richtel.
by Richtel, Matt; ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
Series: SIRS Enduring Issues 2004Article 62Institutions. Publisher: New York Times, 2003ISSN: 1522-3256;.Subject(s): Criminal justice -- Administration of | Criminals | Internet crimes | Internet users | Judgments -- CriminalDDC classification: 050 Summary: "If a person goes to prison for using a computer and the Internet to commit a crime, can he be barred from using the Internet after the sentence is served?" (NEW YORK TIMES) This article examines the issue of whether or not offenders convicted of cybercrime should be allowed computer and Internet access once they are on probation. The impact that these rulings are having on the ways that probation officers monitor offenders is also discussed.| Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Books
|
High School - old - to delete | REF SIRS 2004 Institutions Article 62 (Browse shelf) | Available |
Articles Contained in SIRS Enduring Issues 2004.
Originally Published: Courts Are Split on Internet Bans, Jan. 21, 2003; pp. A1+.
"If a person goes to prison for using a computer and the Internet to commit a crime, can he be barred from using the Internet after the sentence is served?" (NEW YORK TIMES) This article examines the issue of whether or not offenders convicted of cybercrime should be allowed computer and Internet access once they are on probation. The impact that these rulings are having on the ways that probation officers monitor offenders is also discussed.
Records created from non-MARC resource.
There are no comments for this item.