Is High-Tech Hunting Fair Game?. Jeff Barnard.
by Barnard, Jeff; ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
Series: SIRS Enduring Issues 2006Article 33Environment. Publisher: The Seattle Times, 2005ISSN: 1522-3205;.Subject(s): Elk | Ethics | High technology | Hunting | Poaching | Sportsmanship | Technological innovationsDDC classification: 050 Summary: "Heat sensors, remote-controlled cameras, motorized deer decoys, electronic duck calls and mechanical arrowheads may be giving hunters advantage over their prey." (THE SEATTLE TIMES) This article debates the ethics of using technological advances to hunt, noting that "some states are outlawing high-tech innovations that game managers feel give hunters an undue advantage."| Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Books
|
High School - old - to delete | REF SIRS 2006 Environment Article 33 (Browse shelf) | Available |
Articles Contained in SIRS Enduring Issues 2006.
Originally Published: Is High-Tech Hunting Fair Game?, March 1, 2005; pp. A3.
"Heat sensors, remote-controlled cameras, motorized deer decoys, electronic duck calls and mechanical arrowheads may be giving hunters advantage over their prey." (THE SEATTLE TIMES) This article debates the ethics of using technological advances to hunt, noting that "some states are outlawing high-tech innovations that game managers feel give hunters an undue advantage."
Records created from non-MARC resource.
There are no comments for this item.