000 | 01689nam a2200349 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | fol09002580 | ||
003 | ICrlF | ||
005 | 20150716141017.0 | ||
008 | 030723s2004 pauab c b 001 0 eng | ||
010 | _a 2003016560 | ||
020 | _a0791079198 | ||
035 | _a(ICrlF)33933M | ||
040 |
_aDLC _cDLC _dICrlF |
||
042 |
_apcc _alcac |
||
043 | _an-us--- | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aUB343 _b.R87 2003 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a355.2/2363/0973 _222 |
100 | 1 | _aRuschmann, Paul. | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aMandatory military service / _cPaul Ruschmann. |
260 |
_aPhiladelphia : _bChelsea House Publishers, _cc2004. |
||
300 |
_a126 p. : _bill. (some col.), col. map ; _c24 cm. |
||
490 | 1 | _aPoint-counterpoint | |
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 112-113) and index. | ||
505 | 0 | _aHistory of the draft -- Point: an all-volunteer military service endangers national security -- Counterpoint: the United States can meet its military commitments without a draft -- Point: reviving the draft would benefit society -- Counterpoint: reviving the draft would do more harm than good -- Point: even without a draft, a national service requirement would benefit society -- Counterpoint: a national service requirement is unnecessary and unfair -- The future of mandatory service. | |
510 | 3 | _aHorn Book, October 2004 | |
520 | _aExplores the arguments both for and against mandatory military service, analyzing the fundamental issues surrounding the debate over mandatory service in the United States. | ||
521 | 2 |
_aYoung Adult _bFollett Library Resources |
|
650 | 7 |
_aDraft. _2sears |
|
650 | 7 |
_aNational security. _2sears |
|
830 | 0 | _aPoint-counterpoint (Philadelphia, Pa.) | |
942 | _c UKN | ||
999 |
_c77310 _d77310 |